INDEXING OF PENSION
By Ed Barrett
Staff Pensions Executive
In 1984, Mr. Crawford's letter to pensioners announcing the indexing rate also
carried notice of a change in the formula. In that year and for the first
time, a cap was placed on the indexing rate; the cap being based on the
Consumer Price Index (CPI). This event sparked some discussion in The Pelican
Post which is interesting to me to review.
Mr. Waugh's explanation of how the indexing works is still valid and difficult
to improve upon. So it is reproduced here as it was written and published in
The Pelican Post in 1984.
"Since 1965, the Canada Life has supplemented participating
pensions in course of payment on an excess interest approach. The amount of
supplementation is determined by the difference between the average net
interest rate earned by the Canada Life and 4%. The purpose was to help
pensioners faced with the increases in cost‑of‑living. Over the years, our
excess interest rate has lagged well behind the cost‑of‑living index. However,
because of the rapid decline in the Consumer Price Index in 1982, the excess
interest index to apply in January 1984 was 7.06% while the Consumer Price
Index (cost of living) declined to 4.9%. For a pensioner who retired in
December 1983,
a supplement of 4.9% would adjust fully for the change in Consumer Price
Index, and so that is the increase that is provided for him.
However, those pensioners who retired earlier for years saw their pension
eroded by inflation, in spite of the excess interest supplements we were
granting. In order to provide catch‑up, our test for supplementation is to
measure the cumulative excess interest index against the cumulative
cost‑of‑living index. The supplement will be based on the excess interest
index even though it is greater than the cost‑of‑living index, provided that
the cumulative excess interest index does not exceed the cumulative
cost‑of‑living‑index. The effect is shown in the table below for a few
specimen retirement dates
|
|
Cumulative Canadian |
Cumulative Canada
|
|
|
Consumer Price |
Life Excess Interest
|
|
Date of |
Index to |
Index to
|
|
Retirement |
January 1984 |
January 1984 |
|
|
|
|
|
December 1965 |
3.4950 |
1.8332 |
|
December 1970 |
2.8905 |
1.6727 |
|
December 1975 |
1.9776 |
1.4727 |
|
December 1980 |
1.2996 |
1.1997 |
|
December 1982 |
1.049 |
1.0706 |
For a person who retired in December 1980, supplements based on the excess
interest index have increased his pension by 19.97%. In the same period the
cost‑of‑living index has increased by 29.96%. He can continue to get
supplements greater than increases in the cost‑of‑living until the 10%
deficiency is made up. How long this would take (if indeed it does occur)
depends on how the cost‑of‑living index in the next few years compares to our
excess interest index.
On the other hand, the pension of a person who retired in 1965 is so far
behind the cost‑of‑living index that he clearly will never catch up, and so
will always get the supplement based on the excess interest index."
Bill's comment that 1965 retirements are so far behind that they will never
catch up is a good example of why the word "never" should be taken out of the
English language. We have had a number of years where the Company's investment
performance has easily outstripped inflation. The result is that as of this
year, Canadian pensions started in September 1947 or later have caught up to
inflation (January 1970 for the U.S.). I am not sure if we have any pensioners
who retired earlier than this, but if we do, they will have been indexed to at
least 80% of inflation.
Also, and just for the fun of it, I have updated Bill's table as of
December last year.
|
|
Cumulative Canadian |
Cumulative Canada Life |
|
|
Consumer Price
|
Excess Interest |
|
|
Index to
|
Index to
|
|
Date of Retirement |
December 1995 |
December 1995 |
|
|
|
|
|
December 1965 |
5.1941 |
5.3825 |
|
December 1970 |
4.2956 |
4.4315 |
|
December 1975 |
2.9389 |
3.3883 |
|
December 1980 |
1.9313 |
2.7603 |
|
December 1985 |
1.3796 |
1.9834 |
|
December 1990 |
1.1031 |
1.3367 |
The positive difference between the cumulative excess interest and the
cumulative CPI is the amount stored up that we can use to give indexing in
future, provided that the CPI lets us do so and even if there is no excess
interest in that particular year. As you will probably have noticed from the
recent annual report, the Company's earned rate (which will be the benchmark
for indexing next year) has gone up to 9% giving excess interest of 5%.
Since it looks as though inflation will be about 3%, we expect to be able to
put another 2% in the bank for future years.
We are very proud of our indexing record and I think justly so. In return, we
are rewarded constantly by the kind remarks and the loyalty of our pensioners.